To be Valid, a Mass Beaching Theory Must Explain All Consistent Observations and Also Connect Both Modern and Ancient Beachings to a Common Cause
Whale scientists reject the whale beach theory you are about to read even though it explains all the known consistent observations reported at the beach. It also connects modern beaching with those that occur millions of years ago. In other words, what you are about to read fully explains this centuries-old mystery.
I might also add that none of the 150 odd stranding concepts offered by scientists even come close to explaining all the consistent observation. To get around this obvious weakness, the scientists now claim there is partial truth in all their ideas. In other words, whales mass strand for 150 different reasons. To muddy the water even more, they also toss in a sociological concepts. For example, the most often quoted theory of whale scientists is that a large group of odontocete mass strand because they go into shallow water with a sick pod member and get caught by a falling tide because they cannot allow a close friend to die alone.
Scientists are especially fearful of any new idea that might gain so much popularity that it causes them great embarrassment, especially if it’s a simple explanation that they should have come up with a hundred years ago. As an example, suppose pods of whales mass strand themselves because an undersea catastrophic upheaval caused a pressure-related sinus injury in the entire pod and disabled their acoustic sense of direction.
Such a simply idea would make them look like fools if it turned out to be true! Funny thing is, no whale scientists has ever postulated that an entire pod of stranded whales might be lost due to exposure to an undersea earthquake, a volcanic explosions, or the violent impact of a heavenly body with the surface of the ocean.
Pelagic odontocete (toothed whales and dolphins that live in deep offshore waters) have been mass beaching for millions of years. Therefore, as mentioned above, any valid whale beach theory must connect the modern and historical causes. For example, the whale stranding hypothesis presented here suggest that excessive low-frequency (LF) pressure pulsations generated by undersea earthquakes, volcanic explosions, or meteorite impacts cause barosinusitis in the cranial air spaces of diving whales that disables their echo-navigation system. This concept also suggest that military sonar, oil industry air cannons, and explosives cause the same injury simply because these events also produce excessive low-frequency (LF) alterations in diving pressure. In other words, the cause of both ancient and modern beachings is rapid and excessive changes in ambient water pressure resulting in barosinusitis in the cranial air spaces of pods of deep diving whales and dolphins. See sample solutions.
Because the cranial air spaces of odontocete serve an acoustic function, barosinusitis in these air sacs and sinuses will disable biosonar and cause whales to swim blindly downstream. This is so because everything without a sense of direction of its own either floats or swims in the path of least drag. The downstream current guiding whales to beaches is also the same energy that builds the beach in the first place.
This is a valid whale beach hypothesis that also agrees with what the great Nikola Tesla said years ago… “if you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration.”
Undersea earthquakes generate low-frequency hydroacoustic p-waves that are felt by diving whales as excessive changes in diving pressure that can reach 100,000 pounds per square inch.
Pelagic Odontoceti Feed Mostly on Squid!
Species of whales and dolphins that mass strand spends much of their time above seismically active mid-oceanic ridge system where the squid breed and lay their eggs. This area is usually free of navy sonar, seismic air cannons, and undersea explosions. On the other hand, species not known to mass strand do not spend time in seismically active waters. They hang out in areas often visited by seismic survey ships and navy warships. It others words, we can generally assume that natural seafloor upheavals can injure entire pods of pelagic toothed whales and dolphins while navy sonar and human operation injure coastal water species.
Mass stranding whales and dolphins live far offshore in tight social groups. When alone, these individuals are extremely afraid of being attacked from below by large oceanic sharks. When in their pod, they relax because they have many pod mates to alert them of approaching danger. For this reason, they live close to each other and are seldom observed more than a hundred meters from the center of their pod.
On the other hand, species that form loose pods in coastal waters, in which two or three individuals are often found several miles from the pod center, never mass strand. Said differently, major seafloor disturbances are more likely to injury all the members of the pod at the same time. On the other hand, families of coastal species that spread out along 30 miles of coastline are not likely to be injured by a single disturbance.
Timing and the Flow of Current are Important!
Mass strandings occur usually at night and only when the tide is rising and the wind is blowing the surface currents towards the shore; however, most stranded pods are not discovered until the next morning by the first visitors to the beach. This is easily verifiable by looking at hundreds of pictures and online videos. The tide often falls by the time someone takes a picture or video. The stranded animals are then left high and dry at the high tide mark. This indicates that strong shoreward flow guide lost whales to the beach at night. On the other hand, whales never beach when the wind is calm and the tide is flowing out to sea.
Dehydration and no Fresh Food in their Stomachs!
Live-stranded pod members appear outwardly healthy; however, postmortem examinations reveal dehydration, starvation, and a multitude of bacterial, viral and parasitic infections. It is obvious from medical examinations that all the adult members of the pod are ill, not just one or two pod leaders. The two most consistent observations are dehydration and no fresh food in their stomachs. Immune dysfunction goes hand and hand with starvation and dehydration.
The nursing young are usually in far better health than the adults, and can often be more easily rehabilitated.
Stranded whales are successfully pushed back out to deep water only when the tidal currents are flowing out to sea and when there are no stormy waves and currents washing ashore, opposing the outflow of the tidal current. When the waves are breaking in the surf zone and the seas are flowing ashore, the only successful method of refloating stranded whales is to transport them overland to a beach with a favorable outflow to the current.
Mass beachings occur repeatedly along certain shores while other similar shores seldom record such events. Any acceptable theory must explain why whales live strand so often at Cape Sorell, Tasmania, Golden Bay, New Zealand, and Cape Cod in the USA.
Drive Fisheries are Connected!
Drive fisheries for dolphins, such as those in the Faeroe Islands and in Japan, in which men in many small boast drive pods of dolphin onto the shore and then slaughter them in a bloody massacre originated in areas where pods often beached. Thus, there is a close association between mass beached whales and those slaughtered in the drive fisheries. Could the fishermen be herding injured pods predestine to beach anyway?
The Shape of the Land!
Mass beachings most often occur at locations where large geographical land masses extend out to sea opposing the current. Prime examples included Golden Bay and the Chatham Islands, New Zealand, Cape Sorell, Tasmania, and Cape Cod Bay in the USA.
Most major beaching sites around the world show a peak stranding season usually lasting ~90 days. Strandings seldom occur at these repeat locations outside of this limited time frame.
Mass strandings generally occur on gently shelving beaches and do not occur on rocky shores or mud flats or in areas where sand is not accumulating unless the stranding occurs in backwater areas inside an inlet. Obviously, whales will not beach if the water is too deep to stop their forward progress. Whereas gently shelving beaches would naturally trap lost whales. Rocky shorelines and beaches that drop off too fast usually have ample depth to allow a small toothed whale to swim, preventing a beaching in these areas. However, there are thousands upon thousands of miles of mudflats and mangrove shorelines where the water is only a few inches deep for many miles out to the open sea
The Whales Act Lost!
When pushed back to sea, stranded animals often return to shore, or are found re-stranded further downstream from the original site.
Beached whales are most often sighted in the early morning by the first visitors indicating that beachings tend to occur at night. On the other hand, strandings that occur inside an inlet or bay, and in backwater areas, generally occur during low tide when the water recedes from under the whales.
Whale Beaching Theories
The idea that mass stranded whales follow a sick leader or pod member into the shallow water was first proposed in the 1940’s by Dr. Leonard Gill, the director of the South African Museum. Even though this concept is quickly dismissed by a stranding event in which small groups of animals from the same pod strand at different times over a period of several days, the idea is still promoted at every stranding.
Folks wonder where the leader is when whales from the same pod are found scattered along a 20-mile stretch of beach. This theory offers no explanation for season variations in stranding patterns, no reason why there is an increase in night strandings, no explanation for why re-floated animals often re-strand downstream, no reason why strandings do not occur in heavy seas, nor why all the adult members of the pod are usually seriously ill. Besides, suicide over sickness in a leader violates all known evolutionary principles.
Follow the Leader an Old Idea!
However, according to 1,000-plus online newspaper articles about stranded whales, and a hundred different videos like the one below, whale scientists still repeat this old concept over and over again. They say that these pod leaders and/or navigators go ashore because they can no longer stay afloat. Following-the-leader theory first surfaced in newspapers during the 1880s.
The problem with this theory is that there is a far better way to explain why the pod appears to be following a leader.
Lost Whales and the Sharks that Feed on Them!
Suppose an injury caused the pod to lose their acoustic sense of direction. Never mind the details, just follow along assuming that the pod has lost its ability to echo-navigate.
The smell of blood, urine, feces, and body fluids deposited in the water by the overly stressed injured whales would immediately draw in hungry oceanic sharks, prime predators of whales for millions of years. They instinctively know when a pod is in trouble. They must trail from down current so the smell of body fluids will drift back to them. This is where they wait to rip apart any slow swimmer.
Sharks cull the most-injured long before the pod reaches the beach. These means that only those pod members with slight physical injuries will survive long enough to beach.
Fear of being the next whale torn to pieces by a pack of starving sharks will cause individuals to initiate behavior solely directed towards self-preservation. These dying mammals are not so much in love with their pod mates that they would surrender their own lives. They are wild animals with a very strong sense of self-preservation… it’s nature’s way.
To recognize this selfish behavior in whales and dolphins, we need to know a little about behavior in a selfish herd. As applied to herds on the plains of Africa, the individual risk that a predator will attack is greatest on the outside of the herd. The risk decreases towards the center. More dominant herding animals will take the low-risk central positions. These moves forces subordinates into the higher risk outside positions. Again… this is nature’s way.
Something similar is true for an injured herd of whales and dolphins constantly swimming downstream. However, the greatest risk of a shark attack is not around the outside of the pod. The greatest danger is to the animals bringing up the rear because the sharks are smelling the waters, trailing from behind and picking off any stragglers. This means that the least-injured members of the selfish pod will swim in front of the pod, furthest away from the trailing sharks.
This is not an example of a “strong social bond”. Rather, it is a perfect example of selfish herd behavior as outlined is this 1971 science article entitled “Geometry for the Selfish Herd” by W. D. Hamilton.
Selfish Pod Leaders Out Front!
Instead of protecting the young and other pod members by taking a position between the sharks and the rest of the pod, the non-navigating selfish pod leaders, wanting to save their own butts, will be the first to go ashore because they are usually out front while the surface currents are guiding the lost whales ashore. The rest of the pod will follow in a blind-following-the-blind fashion because the same current is also guiding them. This will create the illusion that the pod is following a sick pod mate or leader due to strong social cohesion.
Selfish-herd behavior has been purposefully overlooked by whale experts even though self-preservation is an almost universal hallmark of life. Instead, scientists say that a healthy pod is following one or two sick members to the beach. When the pod does not leave the beach right away, the scientists often say that pod members will not leave a sick member behind because they have such a strong social attachment.
Just the Opposite is True!
The truth is that the entire pod has lost its sense of direction. Those not stuck in the sand will mill around near where their pod members are still stuck for two reasons: (a) the lingering whales believe the sharks are waiting just offshore, and (b) the current near shore is often slack and, with no current, the whales have no sense of direction.
When the tidal flow does start to wash back to deep water, the rescuers know they must push most of the whales out to sea at the same time because no whale wants to be first to meet up with the jaws of death.
One other point about the sharks… they will not attack the collective herd because healthy toothed whales and dolphins have ways of protecting themselves. A few pod members can distract the sharks while others swim down and come up like a rocket, ramming the sharks in the liver. The massive liver of a shark is its most vulnerable spot and the whales know it. The sharks do not know the injured whales cannot defend themselves so they use caution and wait until a single whale lags behind. The whales know this, which explains why they will not swim away for the beach alone. This means that the real value in pushing the lost whales back out to deep water are: (1) Save a lot of money that the city would spend to bury the carcasses, and (2) feed the starving sharks.
Two geo-biologists suggested that the lost pods are following magnetic clues in a form of magnetic “dead” reckoning and accidentally run aground when this magnetic path crosses a shoreline. To make their theory workable, these scientists suggest that toothed whales might be able to use the earth’s magnetic field as an aide to navigation and might beach if this system fails. In other words, this bogus theory creates an imaginary mode of navigation and then uses its failure as an explanation for the beaching.
According to Klinowska, all whale strandings in Britain occur where magnetic field contours are perpendicular (90% right angles) to the shoreline. Since it is a known fact that all mass strandings occur on beaches, then it must hold true that magnetic field contours are perpendicular to the shoreline in areas where beaches are located. What about beaches where the contour lines are at 45% angles or at 30% angles to the shoreline? In fact, if the stranded pods followed the magnetic contours as suggested, they could just as easily be misled to strand where the angles were only 10% or 20%.
The Sun Plays a Part!
According to Klinowska, strandings are also correlated with irregular changes in the magnetic field caused by sunspots and CMEs. But whales usually beach at night. Still, she insist that mass stranded whales use the total geomagnetic field of the Earth as a map. An imagined geomagnetic timer in the brain allows the whales to check their position both night and day since the geomagnetic field changes when the sun comes up. But they are not using the directional information of the Earth’s magnetic field as we do with our compasses. Rather, they are supposedly using small relative differences in the total local field that changes hourly, which explains why they need the imaginary timer.
Klinowska arrived at this explanation after an alleged detailed analysis of the records of strandings in Britain.
But two groups working separately in Newfoundland and New Zealand have failed to duplicate Klinowska’s work. Other scientists who repeated the same geomagnetic studies failed to confirm the stranding patterns suggested. Still, the media continue to report a geomagnetic sense in whales regardless that most studies show no merit in this idea. In other words, there is nothing to support a failed geomagnetic sense of direction yet the press still continues to report this irrational idea. It seems to boil down to one thing. If scientists say it’s so, then the press will print it whether it makes sense or not.
Klinowska said, “The total magnetic field of the Earth is not uniform. It is distorted (along the seafloor near mid-oceanic ridges) by the underlying geology, forming a topography of magnetic ‘hills and valleys.’ My analysis shows that the animals move along the contours of these magnetic slopes and in certain circumstances this can lead them to strand themselves.” Klinowska never tracked any whales to show her analysis; she simply assumed the pods moved along the contours because it fit her idea of a failing compass.
The Magnetic Connection is Not Valid!
But rather than assume the pods move along the magnetic contours, it seems more rational to assume that they are moving along the mid-oceanic spreading ridges following the squid, their favorite food. It just happens that the magnetic patterns do flow along this ridge axis. If the patterns flowed at right angles to the ridge, the whales would then be swimming along at right angles to their favorite food and the geo-biologists would adjust their theory accordingly.
Klinowska also said, “In the oceans, sea-floor spreading has produced a set of almost parallel hills and valleys. Whales could use these as “undersea motorways” but might swim into problems when they came near the shore because the magnetic contours do not stop at the beach. They continue onto the land, and sometimes so do the whales.”
This statement is shown to be pure nonsense in Iceland, which has one of the largest populations of the species known to mass strand in the world. The seafloor spreading ridge moves from the ocean floor through the very center of Iceland as does the geomagnetic contour lines yet Iceland is not known as a mass stranding hot spot. The same thing holds true in other areas where the mid-oceanic spreading ridges run directly onshore.
In addition, why would the whales struggle with the magnetic contours to follow the mid-ocean spreading centers since these areas are seismically speaking one of the noisiest places on earth? Using magnetic patterns to track such noise would be like humans using a magnetic signature to tell when a train roared by.
If the geomagnetic contour lines are leading the pods to the beach, then how does one account for no mass strandings where we know the lines run straight into the shore and where we know there is a large population of the species known to be mass stranders?
Klinowska insists that, in addition to strandings where the land-intersects contours, unpredictable daily changes in the earth’s magnetic field can upset the whales’ imagined timing mechanism, causing them to lose their true position on their magnetic dead-reckoning maps. “Magnetically speaking, they become lost.” But why would the whales use magnetism in broad daylight when all they had to do was to glance at the shoreline. In other words, these geo-biologists have imagined a timing mechanism in the brain of the whales and then imagined that the mechanism is always going on the blink.
The Kirchvink Opinion!
Joseph L. Kirschvink, of the California Institute of Technology, has plotted hundreds of beachings of whales and dolphins along the U.S. East Coast. He finds that whales tend to run aground at spots where the rocks and grains of sand weakened the local magnetic field. Supposedly, these coastal magnetic lows are at the ends of long, continuous channels of magnetic minima that run for great distances along the ocean floors. Kirschvink believes that the stranded whales and dolphins were using these magnetic troughs for navigation and failed to see the stop sign at the beaches and ran aground. The magnetic troughs in this view are super highways for animals equipped with a magnetic sense. If Kirschvink is correct, the magnetic sensors of the whales and dolphins are extremely sensitive because the deepest magnetic troughs are only about 4% weaker than the background magnetic field.
Kirschvink suggests that different species of whales follow different levels of magnetism. This forces the magnetic results to fit the stranding sites.
Efforts to duplicate Kirschvink show no such geomagnetic stranding pattern. Besides, a system of navigation that leads healthy whales to their death does not fit evolutionary processes. For healthy animals to swim blindly into a beach due to “wrong way” geomagnetic clue, other known forms of navigation (vision, biosonar, taste and etc) would all have to fail. In addition, a failed geomagnetic compass offers no explanation for seasonal variations in stranding patterns. There is no reason for an increase in night strandings. There is no reason why re-floated pods often re-strand downstream. No reason for strandings to occur in heavy seas. No reason why all the adult members of the pod are found seriously ill. In addition, magnetite crystals (found in birds, fish, and insects) necessary for a magnetic sense of some sort, so far have not been found in whales and dolphins.
The tendency to strand for stupid reasons would eventually be washed from the gene pool.
Furthermore, if healthy animals swam into a beach due to geomagnetic clues, echo-navigation must also fail. In addition, a failed geomagnetic compass offers no explanation for seasonal variations in stranding patterns. The idea offers no reason for an increase in night strandings. And, why do re-floated pods always re-strand downstream? And why are all the adult members of the pod seriously ill? In addition, no one has ever proven a magnetic sense in whales and dolphins.
A new theory suggests strandings in the Southern Ocean are due to westerly winds that increase in strength. Marine biologist Dr. Karen Evans said the currents have a 12-year cycle. It peaked in 2005. She claims cyclical westerly and southerly winds draw nutrient-rich waters closer to the surface. This draws more whales into shallow water setting up accidental stranding.
Even if true, how could a theory explaining only one area be applied to the entire world?
Accidental strandings simply do not hold water. But the idea that lost pods strand during a strong shoreward wind has merit. Such a theory would also have merit everywhere. Suppose the pod suffered a barotraumatic injury caused by seaquakes in the Southern Ocean. The shoreward current, the energy that builds beaches, would also guide lost whales to the sand. There is also an increase in surface currents moving toward the beaches in New Zealand and Australia in October thru January. This increase accounts for a seasonal increase in strandings during this period. There is also evidence that higher waves on the ocean’s surface increase the number of earthquakes in the seabed.
Suppose a pod suffered a barotraumatic injury caused by seaquakes in the Southern Ocean. This injury knocked out their sonar navigation. Lost whales will always swim downstream. The shoreward current, the energy that builds beaches, would also guide these lost whales to the sand. There is also an increase in surface currents moving toward the beaches in New Zealand and Australia in October thru January. This increase accounts for a seasonal increase in the strandings of non-navigating whales during this period. Moreover, increased surface wave heights send LF pressure waves to the seafloor. This action increases the number of earthquakes in the seabed.
In 1934, F. C. Fraser suggested the inflow of water from the North Atlantic guided the whales to the shallow beaches. He refers to a strong southwesterly wind when false killers went ashore at Mamre, France.
Frazer rightfully thought these strong winds would shift the surface currents. The current would bring prey into the shallows around Mamre. He argues that false killers could easily strand in shallow waters. He also indicates shallow, gently shelving, and sandy coastlines.
Fraser offered no real reason why the current would pull the whales to the beach. Dudok Van Heel assumed the current brought squid into the shallows and the whales followed.
Fraser was suggesting whales might be washed into the beach by the current. This agrees with the Seaquake Theory.
Gentle Shelving Beach!
In 1962, Dudok Van Heel said gently shelving beaches would not bounce the sonar. This theory does not account for the ill-health of the pod members. But it remains popular. It allows those pretending to save stranded whales to seek donations from the public. The public donates as long as they believe the whales accidentally beach. Saving stranded whales has become a big business. It would collapse tomorrow if the public realized the whales were suffering barosinusitis. The stranding crews need to feed, hydrated and protected the whales from sharks for at least a month. Whose gonna pay for this?
Simon Woodings suggested sonar as a navigational tool caused mass strandings. He felt bubbles and sand disrupted echolocation. But whales would turn and swim the other way if their sonar failed.
Sea World said that an aggressive pathogen causes strandings. But a nasty germ would kill the very young. Yet, they are usually the most healthy and most often to survive.
Vanselow and Ricklefs compared sperm whale strandings in the period from 1712 to 2003 with solar activity. Supposedly, 90% of 97 sperm whale strandings in the North Sea took place when sunspots were below average 11-year values. Only 10% occurred when the sunspots were above average.
The problem here is that the sun spends 25% of its time with few sunspots. This does not fit 11-year cycles. The cycles vary far too much. Besides, 90% of whale strandings occur at night when the sun is not shining.
Loss of Echo-navigation due to Barotrauma!
This author created the theory that undersea seismic upheavals caused whale beaching. It first appeared in 1987 in a 106-page booklet. The US Marine Mammal Commission requested the article. The titled was, “Auditory Trauma as the Major Factor in Whale Strandings.” This theory said seaquake-generated pressure waves induced sinus barotrauma is the adult pod members.
The air contained in their cranial air chambers serves underwater to reflect, focus, and channel sound waves. This means that sinus injury disables echo-navigation. It also prevents the animals from diving to the depth of their prey due to pain. The inability to feed leads to immune dysfunction and dehydration. The distressed pod huddles together for protection against sharks. It then swims downstream with the surface currents until a rising tide guides them into a beach. A falling tide leaves them stuck in the sand.
by Capt. David Williams, Chairman
Deafwhale Society, the oldest whale conservation group in the world.
Birby, C. (1935) Two Hundred False Killers Hurl Themselves Ashore, Illustr. London News 187, 1124
Dudok Van Heel, W.H. (1962) Sound and Cetacea, Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, Chapter 11 pp 473-507
Fraser, F.C. (1936) Recent Strandings of False Killer Whale, Pseudorca crassidens, Scottish Naturalist, July-August, 105-114.
Geraci J.B., D.J. St. Aubin, (1979) Biology of Marine Mammals: Insights Through Strandings, U.S. Dept Commerce PB-293 890
Green, L. (1945) So Few Are Free, Howard B. Timmins, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kirschvink, J.L. et al (1986) Evidence From Strandings For Geomagnetic Sensitivity in Cetaceans. Journal of Experimental Biology (120) pp 1-24
Klinowska, M. (1983) Interpretation of the U.K. Cetacean Stranding Records. Rep. Int. Whaling Commission 35:459-467
Klinowska, M. (1985) Cetacean Live Stranding Sites related to Geomagnetic Topography. Aquatic Mammals 11(1):27-32
Klinowska, M. (1987) No Through Road for the Misguided Whale, New Scientist, p. 46, February 12
Lein, J. (1990) Personal communications, Whale Research Group, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland Canada
Reynolds, J and D. Odell, (1991) Marine Mammal Strandings in the United States, Proceedings of the Second Marine Mammal Stranding Workshop, NOAA Technical Report NMFS #98
Smithsonian Institution, Division of Mammals Computer Database, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC
Walsh, M.T. et al (1991) Medical Findings in a Mass Stranding of Pilot Whales in Florida. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 98: Marine Mammal Strandings
Walsh, M.T. et al (1991) Mass Strandings of Cetaceans, chapter 39, page 673. CRC Handbook of Marine Mammal Medicine: Health, Disease, and Rehabilitation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida
Weisburd, S. (1984) Whales and Dolphins Use Magnetic ‘Roads,’ Science News, 126:389